A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of desvenlafaxine succinate
in adult outpatients with major depressive disorder

by
Liebowitz MR, Yeung PP, Entsuah R.
Department of Psychiatry,
Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
mrl1945@aol.com
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;68(11):1663-72.


ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of desvenlafaxine succinate (desvenlafaxine) in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: In this 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adult outpatients (aged 18-75 years) with a primary diagnosis of MDD (DSM-IV criteria) were randomly assigned to treatment with desvenlafaxine (100-200 mg/day) or placebo. The primary outcome measure was the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D(17)) score at final on-therapy evaluation. The Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I) was the key secondary measure. Other secondary measures included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale, Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity (VAS-PI) overall and subcomponent scores, and HAM-D(17) response and remission rates. The study was conducted from June 2003 to May 2004. RESULTS: Of the 247 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 234 comprised the intent-to-treat population. Following titration, mean daily desvenlafaxine doses ranged from 179 to 195 mg/day. At endpoint, there were no significant differences in scores between the desvenlafaxine (N = 120) and placebo (N = 114) groups on the HAM-D(17) or CGI-I. However, the desvenlafaxine group had significantly greater improvement in MADRS scores (p = .047) and in VAS-PI overall pain (p = .008), back pain (p = .006), and arm, leg, or joint pain (p < .001) scores than the placebo group. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (at least 10% and twice the rate of placebo) were nausea, dry mouth, constipation, anorexia, somnolence, and nervousness. CONCLUSION: Desvenlafaxine was generally safe and well tolerated. In this study, it did not show significantly greater efficacy than placebo on the primary or key secondary efficacy endpoints, but it did demonstrate efficacy on an alternate depression scale and pain measure associated with MDD. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00063206.
Options
Desvenlafaxine
Venlafaxine v SSRIs
Venlafaxine compared
Venlafaxine v fluoxetine
High-dose venlafaxine XL
Venlafaxine pharmacology
Venlafaxine plus bupropion
Venlafaxine and depression
Venlafaxine and neuropeptides
Venlafaxine and major depression
Venlafaxine for depressive cocaine users
Venlafaxine (Effexor) v clomipramine for OCD
Venlafaxine for treatment-resistant depression
Venlafaxine, emotional processing and the brain
Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq): another "Me Too" drug?
Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq): efficacy, safety, and tolerability
Depression treated with different formulations of venlafaxine
Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq) to treat menopausal vasomotor symptoms
February 2008: FDA licenses antidepressant desvenlafaxine (Pristiq)


Refs
and further reading

HOME
HedWeb
Nootropics
erythroxylum-coca.com
Future Opioids
BLTC Research
MDMA/Ecstasy
Superhapiness?
Utopian Surgery?
The Abolitionist Project
The Hedonistic Imperative
The Reproductive Revolution
Critique of Huxley's Brave New World

The Good Drug Guide
The Good Drug Guide

The Responsible Parent's Guide
To Healthy Mood Boosters For All The Family