Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal
syndrome: a randomized comparative study versus benzodiazepine
by
Addolorato G, Balducci G, Capristo E, Attilia ML,
Taggi F, Gasbarrini G,
Ceccanti M
Institute of Internal Medicine,
Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore,
Rome,
Italy.
ecapristo@pelagus.it
Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999 Oct; 23(10):1596-604
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepine has been shown to be one of the most effective
class of drugs in the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS).
Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) has recently been introduced in the treatment of
alcohol problems, including AWS. At present there are no comparative studies
between benzodiazepines and GHB in AWS treatment. The aim of the present
randomized, controlled, single-blind study was to evaluate the efficacy and
safety of GHB compared with diazepam in the treatment of AWS. METHODS: Sixty
alcoholics affected by AWS were enrolled in the study. Diazepam (0.5-0.75 mg/kg
body weight for 6 days, tapering the dose 25% daily until day 10) was
administered orally to 30 patients (25 males, 5 females; mean age 44.3 +/- 10.9
years); GHB (50 mg/kg body weight for 10 days) was administered orally to 30
patients (26 males,4 females; mean age 41.7 +/- 10.4 years).The Clinical
Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-revised scale (CIWA-Ar) was used to
evaluate the AWS physical symptoms. The State Anxiety Inventory test for current
anxiety assessment and the Zung self-rating Depression Scale for current
depression assessment were performed. RESULTS: Eight patients (26.6%) in the
diazepam group and 4 patients (13.3%) in the GHB group dropped out. Both
treatments were effective in reducing AWS. No significant difference was found
between the groups in CIWA-Ar total score at baseline and at the different times
of observation. Considering the CIWA-Ar subscore and Zung scale, a significant
reduction of anxiety on day 4 (p < 0.02), agitation on day 5 (p < 0.02)
and time of recovery of depression on day 5 (p < 0.02) was observed in the
GHB group with respect to the diazepam group. Drowsiness and vertigo developed
after initial drug administration in the GHB (19.2%) and diazepam (36.4%) groups
and quickly resolved in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: GHB is as effective in the
management of AWS as benzodiazepine and it seems to be quicker in reducing
anxiety, agitation, and depression. Both drugs are safe and well-tolerated in
AWS management.
GHB
GABA
Reward
Ethanol
Dopamine
GHB: structure
Benzodiazepines
GHB and cocaine
Drugs and reward
Moderate drinking
GHB versus alcohol
Drugs for alcoholics
Ethyl alcohol and suicide
GHB and growth hormone
Drink, drugs and asceticism
Alcohol, dopamine and opioids
GHB, tryptophan and serotonin
GHB: use, abuse and withdrawal
GHB as a signalling molecule in brain
Alcohol, alcoholism and GABA(A) receptors
Gamma-butyrolactone (GBL): a natural component of wine
GHB (Xyrem) v naltrexone in maintaining alcohol abstinence
Refs
HOME
HedWeb
Future Opioids
BLTC Research
Paradise-Engineering
Utopian Pharmacology
The Hedonistic Imperative
When Is It Best To Take Crack Cocaine?

The Good Drug Guide
The Responsible Parent's Guide
To Healthy Mood Boosters For All The Family